RM125 for an ECRL ticket to Kota Bharu sounds reasonable enough. But bring three adult friends along, and that's RM500 for a one-way trip.
For the same journey, four people could share the petrol bill in one car. And if that car happens to be electric, the calculation gets even more interesting.
So, is taking the train actually cheaper than driving?
With the East Coast Rail Link (ECRL) passenger fares now announced, we've compared the numbers for petrol cars, EVs and train passengers.
As it turns out, the cheapest option depends on more than just the price of a ticket. Who you're travelling with, whether you're eligible for discounted fares and even where you charge your EV could change the answer.
THE QUICK TAKE
ECRL: Economy Transit tickets from Gombak to Kota Bharu start at RM125 per adult, one-way.
Petrol: Our illustrative 420 km drive costs approximately RM58.51 with BUDI95 or RM135.83 with unsubsidised RON95.
EV: The same journey could consume around 75.6 kWh, but electricity costs depend on charging rates.
Discounts: Eligible ECRL passengers can receive concessions of 40% or 50%, subject to terms and conditions.
The ECRL's Economy Class fares are finally out, with one-way tickets from Gombak to Kota Bharu starting at RM125 for Transit and RM147 for Express.
Heading somewhere closer? Transit fares start at RM95 to Kuala Terengganu and RM60 to KotaSAS, while Express tickets begin at RM110 and RM68, respectively.
These are starting fares, not fixed prices. The ECRL will use dynamic pricing, and the same starting fares apply in both directions.
But how much would it cost to drive instead?
For our comparison, we're using an estimated 420 km road journey via Gua Musang, alongside two illustrative vehicle-consumption figures.
OUR DRIVING ASSUMPTIONS
PETROL CAR
7L/100 km
Example vehicle types: Perodua Aruz, Proton X50
ELECTRIC CAR
18 kWh/100 km
Example vehicle types: BYD Atto 3, Proton e.MAS 7
Note: Both consumption figures are illustrative mixed-driving estimates, not measured results for the models listed. Actual consumption varies with the vehicle, terrain, speed, driving style and passenger load.
Distance note: The ECRL covers 523 km by rail, compared with our estimated 420 km road journey.
Let's start with petrol. At an assumed average consumption of 7L/100 km, a car would use approximately 29.4 litres over the 420 km journey.
Based on Malaysian petrol prices effective from 15 to 21 October 2026, that's RM58.51 with BUDI95, or RM135.83 with unsubsidised RON95.
What about an EV?
At an assumed 18 kWh/100 km, our hypothetical EV would consume approximately 75.6 kWh over the same distance.
The tricky part is charging. Home electricity and public DC charging can produce very different bills, even when the vehicle consumes the same amount of energy.
Here's how the numbers stack up.
| Transport / Energy Scenario | One-Way Cost |
|---|---|
| ECRL Transit, 1 full-fare adult | From RM125.00 |
| Petrol, BUDI95 at RM1.99/L | RM58.51 |
| Petrol, unsubsidised RON95 at RM4.62/L | RM135.83 |
| EV, illustrative charging at RM0.50/kWh | RM37.80 |
| EV, illustrative charging at RM1.30/kWh | RM98.28 |
| EV, illustrative charging at RM1.70/kWh | RM128.52 |
Note: ECRL fares are per passenger, while driving figures are estimated energy costs for one vehicle. EV rates are hypothetical, not verified tariffs along the route. Charging losses, tolls, other vehicle expenses and station transfers are excluded. BUDI95 applies only to eligible motorists.
At first glance, RM37.80 makes an EV look like the clear winner. But that assumes all 75.6 kWh of energy can be accounted for at just RM0.50/kWh, before charging losses.
At RM1.70/kWh, the estimated EV energy cost rises to RM128.52, slightly above the ECRL's RM125 starting Transit fare for one adult.
Of course, we're comparing a vehicle's energy expense with a passenger's train ticket, not the complete cost of either journey. And whether an EV can make the trip without charging is another consideration, which we'll get to shortly.
The takeaway? An EV can be inexpensive to run, but how cheaply you charge matters just as much as how efficiently you drive.
There's another factor that can make a much bigger difference than the type of car you're driving.
The number of people travelling.
An ECRL ticket is purchased per passenger. A car's energy expenses, meanwhile, are shared by everyone inside.
Using our baseline assumptions, here's how the comparison changes.
| Travellers | ECRL Transit From | Petrol: BUDI95 | EV: RM1.30/kWh |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 adult | RM125 | RM58.51 | RM98.28 |
| 2 adults | RM250 | RM58.51 | RM98.28 |
| 4 adults | RM500 | RM58.51 | RM98.28 |
Note: One-way comparison using full-fare adults and constant baseline vehicle energy consumption. Actual consumption may increase with passenger load. EV charging prices are hypothetical. Tolls and other expenses are excluded.
For a solo traveller eligible for BUDI95, our petrol car uses approximately RM66.49 less in fuel than the cheapest ECRL Transit ticket.
Under the RM1.30/kWh EV scenario, the difference is RM26.72.
But bring three more full-fare adults, and the ECRL ticket total rises to RM500.
The car's energy bill doesn't quadruple just because four people are travelling.
ONE CAR, FOUR PASSENGERS
Four ECRL Transit tickets start at RM500 one-way. Sharing a car can make petrol or EV energy expenses substantially cheaper per person, although tolls and other driving costs still matter.
Four people travelling to Kota Bharu doesn't necessarily mean four RM125 ECRL tickets.
Take a family of two adults and two children, for example. If both children qualify for MRL's 50% concession, the family's one-way Transit fare could be considerably lower than the cost of four full-fare tickets.
FOUR FULL-FARE PASSENGERS
RM500
4 adults × RM125
TWO ADULTS + TWO ELIGIBLE CHILDREN
RM375
2 × RM125 + 2 × RM62.50
RM125 LESS WITH CHILD CONCESSIONS
Note: Illustrative one-way Transit fares based on the RM125 starting price. Actual prices and concession eligibility are subject to dynamic pricing and applicable terms and conditions.
And children aren't the only passengers eligible for discounted fares.
MRL has announced 50% discounts for children aged two to 12, Malaysian senior citizens aged 60 and above, OKU cardholders and government pensioners.
Eligible students aged 13 to 24, meanwhile, receive a 40% discount.
Based on the RM125 starting fare, that works out to an illustrative RM62.50 for a 50% concession ticket, or RM75 for an eligible student.
Does that make the train cheaper than driving? Not necessarily.
Even with concessions, the family's train tickets could cost more than the fuel needed for one shared car under our assumptions. But discounts do narrow the gap, particularly for households with several eligible passengers.
Our hypothetical EV consumes approximately 75.6 kWh over 420 km. But can it actually complete the journey without stopping to charge?
That depends on its usable battery capacity, starting charge and real-world efficiency.
Some EVs may have sufficient range under favourable conditions. Others will need a charging stop, especially if sustained highway speeds, terrain or air-conditioning increase consumption.
And unlike a quick petrol stop, DC charging can add time depending on charger availability, the vehicle's charging capabilities and how much energy needs to be added.
Drivers also need to plan where to charge and ensure they can reach a suitable charger with enough battery remaining.
So while an EV may look inexpensive on paper, the real question is whether the journey works comfortably for your particular car.
A cheaper journey doesn't always mean a better journey. Especially when you're travelling to Kelantan.
Beyond fuel and electricity, driving also involves tolls, servicing, tyre wear and other vehicle expenses. Train passengers, meanwhile, need to factor in transport to Gombak station and getting around after arriving in Kota Bharu.
Then there's the time spent travelling.
The ECRL Express service is expected to complete the Gombak-Kota Bharu journey in approximately four hours, while Transit could take around five hours.
But there's an important distinction: the four-hour journey applies to Express tickets starting at RM147, not the RM125 Transit service.
Our illustrative driving estimate, meanwhile, is around eight hours, depending on traffic, rest stops and road conditions.
And anyone who's experienced balik kampung traffic towards Kelantan knows just how unpredictable that journey can be.
Of course, the ECRL's advertised journey times are station-to-station. Getting to the station, boarding and arranging onward transport will add to the overall travel time.
Still, the train offers something driving doesn't: the freedom to spend those hours doing something other than concentrating on the road.
As we explored in our earlier feature, the ECRL passenger experience is expected to include onboard prayer facilities, reclining seats, luggage storage and connectivity features.
But driving retains one major advantage.
Your car is already there when you arrive.
For travellers visiting relatives, exploring Kelantan or making several stops, having their own vehicle could be a major convenience.
For groups, driving has a substantial advantage in shared energy expenses under our assumptions. Solo travellers, meanwhile, face a more personal trade-off between cost, journey time and convenience.
Here's how the options compare for different travellers.
WHICH OPTION MAKES MORE SENSE?
Families and groups: Driving generally looks more economical on energy expenses alone, particularly when the vehicle is shared.
Solo travellers: The ECRL becomes more appealing if avoiding a long drive matters more than achieving the lowest possible energy cost.
Concession-eligible passengers: Discounted ECRL fares could make the train a more attractive option, although actual savings depend on ticket pricing and eligibility.
Ultimately, the ECRL's biggest selling point might not be the lowest fare. It could be reaching Kota Bharu without spending hours behind the wheel.
And for anyone who's endured a long balik kampung journey, that alone might be worth paying for.
Planning a trip to Kota Bharu? Here are some common questions about ECRL ticket prices, journey times and driving costs.
How We Calculated The Costs
This comparison assumes a 420 km road journey via Gua Musang, with petrol consumption of 7L/100 km and EV consumption of 18 kWh/100 km. The ECRL covers 523 km by rail.
Petrol costs use prices effective from 15 to 21 October 2026, while EV charging rates are illustrative. Train fares are per passenger; driving energy costs are per vehicle.
Figures exclude tolls, vehicle expenses, charging losses and station transfers. ECRL fares are starting prices, with actual ticket costs and concessions subject to dynamic pricing and applicable terms.
